Bot Appétit the free AEO + SEO readiness check
Scan
Research

Framer AI readiness statistics

In November 2026, we could only tell which sites run on Framer where our scanner could read the page, so this page covers those sites and says nothing about how many turned our scanner away.

Updated 04:07 UTC · November 2026

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

All sites on the State of the Web

How Framer sites land

Every page we read gets a score out of 100, the number at the top of its report (how scoring works). Each row is a range of scores. Where too few sites score in the lowest ranges, they are joined into one row.

  • 91–100 33%
  • 0–90 67%
Show as a table
ScoreShare of sites
91–10033%
0–9067%

A platform is only detectable on a page our scanner could read, so these shares are of the Framer sites we could read.

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

Better or worse

Not enough history yet.

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

AI access

  • robots.txt disallows some AI crawlers 7%
  • robots.txt disallows major AI crawlers 1%
Show as a table
What we foundShare of sites
robots.txt disallows some AI crawlers7%
robots.txt disallows major AI crawlers1%

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

What Framer sites get right and wrong

Passed more often than on the average site: “Clean content for agents (Markdown)” (83%, against 6% of all sites); “Open Graph tags for sharing” (91%, against 34% of all sites); “This page declares its canonical URL” (91%, against 63% of all sites). Least often passed: several checks that no Framer site we could read passed.

Every check, Framer against all sites

Share of sites that pass each check, over the sites the check applies to. The Gap column is the difference in percentage points between the two shares; a dash means not enough sites yet.

Check Framer sites All sites Gap (points)
Served over a secure HTTPS connection 100% >99% Level
HTTP redirects to HTTPS 96% 93% +3 points
No mixed (insecure) content 100% 99% +1 point
Core security headers are set 18% 12% +6 points
Not flagged for malware or phishing 100% 100% Level
No server version leakage 98% 90% +8 points
security.txt is published 9% 4% +5 points
Reached without a redirect chain 100% 98% +2 points
Caching or validation headers are set 98% 94% +4 points
The site settles on one host (www vs non-www) 91% 87% +4 points
robots.txt is present and not over-blocking 94% 88% +6 points
Not accidentally set to noindex 99% 99% Level
This page declares its canonical URL 91% 63% +28 points
Mobile viewport is set 100% 91% +9 points
Has a title tag 100% >99% Level
Title fits a search snippet 59% 52% +7 points
Has a meta description 100% 90% +10 points
Description fits a search snippet 62% 61% +1 point
The page has an H1 85% 77% +8 points
Logical heading order 35% 62% −27 points
Topic is consistent across title, H1 and description 57% 57% Level
Images have descriptive alt text 97% 90% +7 points
Your page's HTML isn't oversized 86% 98% −12 points
Open Graph tags for sharing 91% 34% +57 points
Twitter/X card tags 97% 69% +28 points
XML sitemap is present and referenced 83% 70% +13 points
Missing pages return a real 404 87% 89% −2 points
Images are optimised 38% 16% +22 points
Language and charset declared 92% 89% +3 points
hreflang for language variants 100% 99% +1 point
Analytics is installed 81% 72% +9 points
Search Console / Bing verification 84% 79% +5 points
A favicon is set 100% 95% +5 points
No meta-refresh redirect 100% 99% +1 point
Your content survives without JavaScript 97% 93% +4 points
Your answer is in the HTML 97% 92% +5 points
Buttons, links and fields have names 28% 37% −9 points
Semantic HTML landmarks 23% 53% −30 points
Content is scannable in self-contained chunks 94% 89% +5 points
Claims come with figures, quotes or sources 66% 54% +12 points
Section headings are phrased as questions 32% 22% +10 points
Reading the page is affordable for a machine 84% 87% −3 points
No hidden text written for an AI model 100% >99% Level
Sitemap dates tell a machine what changed 5% 63% −58 points
The links in llms.txt resolve 88% 87% +1 point
Author / publisher is clear 34% 47% −13 points
A machine-readable published / updated date 8% 13% −5 points
llms.txt is present and valid 33% 23% +10 points
Clean content for agents (Markdown) 83% 6% +77 points
Structured data is present 39% 53% −14 points
Structured data is valid 98% 97% +1 point
FAQ / Q&A schema 16% 44% −28 points
Organization schema with sameAs 25% 27% −2 points
Right schema type for the page 95% 85% +10 points
Schema facts also appear in the page text — 54% —
Breadcrumb structured data — 23% —
AI crawlers aren't blocked 91% 89% +2 points
Automated visitors can reach your pages — — —
Engines are allowed to quote the page 100% 99% +1 point
Your page arrives quickly 97% 95% +2 points
AI bot rules are explicit and intentional 18% 16% +2 points
Content usage preferences declared 9% 5% +4 points
Resource-discovery Link headers 3% 1% +2 points
No broken links 91% 87% +4 points
Links don't point at redirects 96% 88% +8 points
Descriptive anchor text 99% 99% Level
Sensible internal/external link mix 97% 94% +3 points
Links are real links 46% 86% −40 points
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) — — —
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) — — —
Interaction to Next Paint (INP) — — —
Page weight and render-blocking — — —
MCP Server Card 3% 1% +2 points
AI catalog 3% 1% +2 points
A2A Agent Card 2% <1% +2 points
WebMCP tools in the page 0% 2% −2 points
AI usage preferences (Content-Usage) 0% <1% Level
Licensing terms for AI (RSL) 0% <1% Level
Text-and-data-mining reservation (TDMRep) 0% <1% Level
Markdown version linked from the page 3% 1% +2 points
Content signals agree everywhere — — —
Agent Skills index 3% 1% +2 points
API catalog 3% 1% +2 points
OAuth authorization-server metadata 3% 3% Level
OAuth protected-resource metadata 2% 2% Level
OpenID Connect discovery 1% 2% −1 point
Web Bot Auth (operates a signed bot) 0% <1% Level
Universal Commerce Protocol manifest — 10% —
Auth.md agent registration 3% <1% +3 points
AI discovery via DNS 0% <1% Level

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

See how your site compares

A free scan checks all of this on your page in seconds, with no signup.

Scan your site free

Want it handled? We do that too. No pitch, just a plain-English chat.

Book a call