Bot Appétit the free AEO + SEO readiness check
Scan
Research

Education & research AI readiness statistics

In November 2026, we could only place a site in an industry where our scanner could read the page, so this page covers Education & research sites we could read and says nothing about how many turned our scanner away.

Updated 13:07 UTC · November 2026

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

All sites on the State of the Web

See the Education & research leaderboard

How Education & research sites land

Every page we read gets a score out of 100, the number at the top of its report (how scoring works). Each row is a range of scores. Where too few sites score in the lowest ranges, they are joined into one row.

Not enough sites yet There are not enough sites yet to split them by score.

An industry is only known for a page our scanner could read, so these shares are of the Education & research sites we could read.

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

Better or worse

Not enough history yet.

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

AI access

  • robots.txt disallows some AI crawlers 7%
  • robots.txt disallows major AI crawlers 0%
Show as a table
What we foundShare of sites
robots.txt disallows some AI crawlers7%
robots.txt disallows major AI crawlers0%

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

What Education & research sites get right and wrong

Passed more often than on the average site: “Sitemap dates tell a machine what changed” (82%, against 68% of all sites); “Claims come with figures, quotes or sources” (64%, against 56% of all sites); “Core security headers are set” (14%, against 9% of all sites). Least often passed: several checks that no Education & research site we could read passed.

Every check, Education & research against all sites

Share of sites that pass each check, over the sites the check applies to. The Gap column is the difference in percentage points between the two shares; a dash means not enough sites yet.

Check Education & research sites All sites Gap (points)
Served over a secure HTTPS connection 100% >99% Level
HTTP redirects to HTTPS 91% 95% −4 points
No mixed (insecure) content 100% 99% +1 point
Core security headers are set 14% 9% +5 points
Not flagged for malware or phishing 100% 100% Level
No server version leakage 93% 94% −1 point
security.txt is published 3% 5% −2 points
Reached without a redirect chain 99% 99% Level
Caching or validation headers are set 97% 95% +2 points
The site settles on one host (www vs non-www) 84% 87% −3 points
robots.txt is present and not over-blocking 93% 91% +2 points
Not accidentally set to noindex 97% 99% −2 points
This page declares its canonical URL 53% 59% −6 points
Mobile viewport is set 93% 94% −1 point
Has a title tag 100% >99% Level
Title fits a search snippet 49% 59% −10 points
Has a meta description 78% 91% −13 points
Description fits a search snippet 50% 64% −14 points
The page has an H1 87% 87% Level
Logical heading order 65% 64% +1 point
Topic is consistent across title, H1 and description 63% 65% −2 points
Images have descriptive alt text 94% 96% −2 points
Your page's HTML isn't oversized 99% 99% Level
Open Graph tags for sharing 21% 23% −2 points
Twitter/X card tags 72% 75% −3 points
XML sitemap is present and referenced 71% 76% −5 points
Missing pages return a real 404 93% 93% Level
Images are optimised 18% 13% +5 points
Language and charset declared 83% 85% −2 points
hreflang for language variants — 99% —
Analytics is installed 76% 76% Level
Search Console / Bing verification 72% 82% −10 points
A favicon is set 99% 99% Level
No meta-refresh redirect 99% >99% −1 point
Your content survives without JavaScript 99% 97% +2 points
Your answer is in the HTML 99% 96% +3 points
Buttons, links and fields have names 35% 32% +3 points
Semantic HTML landmarks 48% 50% −2 points
Content is scannable in self-contained chunks 96% 94% +2 points
Claims come with figures, quotes or sources 64% 56% +8 points
Section headings are phrased as questions 20% 22% −2 points
Reading the page is affordable for a machine 94% 92% +2 points
No hidden text written for an AI model 100% >99% Level
Sitemap dates tell a machine what changed 82% 68% +14 points
The links in llms.txt resolve — 84% —
Author / publisher is clear 43% 51% −8 points
A machine-readable published / updated date 10% 11% −1 point
llms.txt is present and valid 16% 29% −13 points
Clean content for agents (Markdown) 3% 4% −1 point
Structured data is present 51% 56% −5 points
Structured data is valid 95% 97% −2 points
FAQ / Q&A schema — 47% —
Organization schema with sameAs 28% 33% −5 points
Right schema type for the page 93% 95% −2 points
Schema facts also appear in the page text — 57% —
Breadcrumb structured data — 28% —
AI crawlers aren't blocked 91% 92% −1 point
Automated visitors can reach your pages — — —
Engines are allowed to quote the page 100% 99% +1 point
Your page arrives quickly 93% 97% −4 points
AI bot rules are explicit and intentional 15% 14% +1 point
Content usage preferences declared 2% 4% −2 points
Resource-discovery Link headers 0% 2% −2 points
No broken links 80% 87% −7 points
Links don't point at redirects 90% 92% −2 points
Descriptive anchor text 100% 99% +1 point
Sensible internal/external link mix 97% 96% +1 point
Links are real links 89% 92% −3 points
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) — — —
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) — — —
Interaction to Next Paint (INP) — — —
Page weight and render-blocking — — —
MCP Server Card 0% 1% −1 point
AI catalog 0% 1% −1 point
A2A Agent Card 0% <1% Level
WebMCP tools in the page 0% <1% Level
AI usage preferences (Content-Usage) 0% <1% Level
Licensing terms for AI (RSL) 1% <1% +1 point
Text-and-data-mining reservation (TDMRep) 1% <1% +1 point
Markdown version linked from the page 1% 1% Level
Content signals agree everywhere — — —
Agent Skills index 0% 1% −1 point
API catalog 0% 1% −1 point
OAuth authorization-server metadata 0% 2% −2 points
OAuth protected-resource metadata 0% 2% −2 points
OpenID Connect discovery 0% 2% −2 points
Web Bot Auth (operates a signed bot) 0% <1% Level
Universal Commerce Protocol manifest — 7% —
Auth.md agent registration 0% <1% Level
AI discovery via DNS 0% <1% Level

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

See how your site compares

A free scan checks all of this on your page in seconds, with no signup.

Scan your site free

Want it handled? We do that too. No pitch, just a plain-English chat.

Book a call