Bot Appétit the free AEO + SEO readiness check
Scan
Research

Entertainment & games AI readiness statistics

In November 2026, we could only place a site in an industry where our scanner could read the page, so this page covers Entertainment & games sites we could read and says nothing about how many turned our scanner away.

Updated 13:07 UTC · November 2026

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

All sites on the State of the Web

See the Entertainment & games leaderboard

How Entertainment & games sites land

Every page we read gets a score out of 100, the number at the top of its report (how scoring works). Each row is a range of scores. Where too few sites score in the lowest ranges, they are joined into one row.

Not enough sites yet There are not enough sites yet to split them by score.

An industry is only known for a page our scanner could read, so these shares are of the Entertainment & games sites we could read.

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

Better or worse

Not enough history yet.

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

AI access

  • robots.txt disallows some AI crawlers 10%
  • robots.txt disallows major AI crawlers 0%
Show as a table
What we foundShare of sites
robots.txt disallows some AI crawlers10%
robots.txt disallows major AI crawlers0%

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

What Entertainment & games sites get right and wrong

Passed more often than on the average site: “Buttons, links and fields have names” (43%, against 32% of all sites); “Description fits a search snippet” (75%, against 64% of all sites); “Open Graph tags for sharing” (31%, against 23% of all sites). Least often passed: several checks that no Entertainment & games site we could read passed.

Every check, Entertainment & games against all sites

Share of sites that pass each check, over the sites the check applies to. The Gap column is the difference in percentage points between the two shares; a dash means not enough sites yet.

Check Entertainment & games sites All sites Gap (points)
Served over a secure HTTPS connection 100% >99% Level
HTTP redirects to HTTPS 98% 95% +3 points
No mixed (insecure) content 98% 99% −1 point
Core security headers are set 12% 9% +3 points
Not flagged for malware or phishing 100% 100% Level
No server version leakage 86% 94% −8 points
security.txt is published 0% 5% −5 points
Reached without a redirect chain 98% 99% −1 point
Caching or validation headers are set 90% 95% −5 points
The site settles on one host (www vs non-www) 79% 87% −8 points
robots.txt is present and not over-blocking 93% 91% +2 points
Not accidentally set to noindex 100% 99% +1 point
This page declares its canonical URL 64% 59% +5 points
Mobile viewport is set 90% 94% −4 points
Has a title tag 100% >99% Level
Title fits a search snippet 67% 59% +8 points
Has a meta description 88% 91% −3 points
Description fits a search snippet 75% 64% +11 points
The page has an H1 76% 87% −11 points
Logical heading order 71% 64% +7 points
Topic is consistent across title, H1 and description 43% 65% −22 points
Images have descriptive alt text 100% 96% +4 points
Your page's HTML isn't oversized 95% 99% −4 points
Open Graph tags for sharing 31% 23% +8 points
Twitter/X card tags 71% 75% −4 points
XML sitemap is present and referenced 76% 76% Level
Missing pages return a real 404 81% 93% −12 points
Images are optimised 6% 13% −7 points
Language and charset declared 76% 85% −9 points
hreflang for language variants — 99% —
Analytics is installed 55% 76% −21 points
Search Console / Bing verification 71% 82% −11 points
A favicon is set 95% 99% −4 points
No meta-refresh redirect 100% >99% Level
Your content survives without JavaScript 90% 97% −7 points
Your answer is in the HTML 83% 96% −13 points
Buttons, links and fields have names 43% 32% +11 points
Semantic HTML landmarks 45% 50% −5 points
Content is scannable in self-contained chunks 83% 94% −11 points
Claims come with figures, quotes or sources — 56% —
Section headings are phrased as questions — 22% —
Reading the page is affordable for a machine 92% 92% Level
No hidden text written for an AI model 100% >99% Level
Sitemap dates tell a machine what changed — 68% —
The links in llms.txt resolve — 84% —
Author / publisher is clear 38% 51% −13 points
A machine-readable published / updated date 14% 11% +3 points
llms.txt is present and valid 10% 29% −19 points
Clean content for agents (Markdown) 0% 4% −4 points
Structured data is present 60% 56% +4 points
Structured data is valid — 97% —
FAQ / Q&A schema — 47% —
Organization schema with sameAs 12% 33% −21 points
Right schema type for the page — 95% —
Schema facts also appear in the page text — 57% —
Breadcrumb structured data — 28% —
AI crawlers aren't blocked 88% 92% −4 points
Automated visitors can reach your pages — — —
Engines are allowed to quote the page 100% 99% +1 point
Your page arrives quickly 95% 97% −2 points
AI bot rules are explicit and intentional 14% 14% Level
Content usage preferences declared 7% 4% +3 points
Resource-discovery Link headers 0% 2% −2 points
No broken links 78% 87% −9 points
Links don't point at redirects 78% 92% −14 points
Descriptive anchor text 100% 99% +1 point
Sensible internal/external link mix 86% 96% −10 points
Links are real links 81% 92% −11 points
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) — — —
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) — — —
Interaction to Next Paint (INP) — — —
Page weight and render-blocking — — —
MCP Server Card 0% 1% −1 point
AI catalog 0% 1% −1 point
A2A Agent Card 0% <1% Level
WebMCP tools in the page 0% <1% Level
AI usage preferences (Content-Usage) 0% <1% Level
Licensing terms for AI (RSL) 0% <1% Level
Text-and-data-mining reservation (TDMRep) 0% <1% Level
Markdown version linked from the page 0% 1% −1 point
Content signals agree everywhere — — —
Agent Skills index 0% 1% −1 point
API catalog 0% 1% −1 point
OAuth authorization-server metadata 0% 2% −2 points
OAuth protected-resource metadata 0% 2% −2 points
OpenID Connect discovery 0% 2% −2 points
Web Bot Auth (operates a signed bot) 0% <1% Level
Universal Commerce Protocol manifest — 7% —
Auth.md agent registration 0% <1% Level
AI discovery via DNS 0% <1% Level

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

See how your site compares

A free scan checks all of this on your page in seconds, with no signup.

Scan your site free

Want it handled? We do that too. No pitch, just a plain-English chat.

Book a call