Research

Property & construction AI readiness statistics

In November 2026, we could only place a site in an industry where our scanner could read the page, so this page covers Property & construction sites we could read and says nothing about how many turned our scanner away.

Updated 13:07 UTC · November 2026

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

All sites on the State of the Web

See the Property & construction leaderboard

How Property & construction sites land

Every page we read gets a score out of 100, the number at the top of its report (how scoring works). Each row is a range of scores. Where too few sites score in the lowest ranges, they are joined into one row.

  • 91–100 51%
  • 0–90 49%
Show as a table
Share of Property & construction sites in each score range
ScoreShare of sites
91–10051%
0–9049%

An industry is only known for a page our scanner could read, so these shares are of the Property & construction sites we could read.

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

Better or worse

Not enough history yet.

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

AI access

  • robots.txt disallows some AI crawlers 4%
  • robots.txt disallows major AI crawlers 0%
Show as a table
How Property & construction sites treat AI crawlers
What we foundShare of sites
robots.txt disallows some AI crawlers4%
robots.txt disallows major AI crawlers0%

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

What Property & construction sites get right and wrong

Passed more often than on the average site: “Author / publisher is clear” (65%, against 51% of all sites); “Structured data is present” (68%, against 56% of all sites); “Organization schema with sameAs” (43%, against 33% of all sites). Least often passed: several checks that no Property & construction site we could read passed.

Every check, Property & construction against all sites

Share of sites that pass each check, over the sites the check applies to. The Gap column is the difference in percentage points between the two shares; a dash means not enough sites yet.

Property & construction sites against all sites: share passing each check
Check Property & construction sites All sites Gap (points)
Served over a secure HTTPS connection 100% >99% Level
HTTP redirects to HTTPS 95% 95% Level
No mixed (insecure) content 100% 99% +1 point
Core security headers are set 6% 9% −3 points
Not flagged for malware or phishing 100% 100% Level
No server version leakage 96% 94% +2 points
security.txt is published 1% 5% −4 points
Reached without a redirect chain 100% 99% +1 point
Caching or validation headers are set 94% 95% −1 point
The site settles on one host (www vs non-www) 92% 87% +5 points
robots.txt is present and not over-blocking 88% 91% −3 points
Not accidentally set to noindex 100% 99% +1 point
This page declares its canonical URL 68% 59% +9 points
Mobile viewport is set 92% 94% −2 points
Has a title tag 100% >99% Level
Title fits a search snippet 62% 59% +3 points
Has a meta description 94% 91% +3 points
Description fits a search snippet 61% 64% −3 points
The page has an H1 94% 87% +7 points
Logical heading order 65% 64% +1 point
Topic is consistent across title, H1 and description 75% 65% +10 points
Images have descriptive alt text 97% 96% +1 point
Your page's HTML isn't oversized 100% 99% +1 point
Open Graph tags for sharing 25% 23% +2 points
Twitter/X card tags 78% 75% +3 points
XML sitemap is present and referenced 79% 76% +3 points
Missing pages return a real 404 95% 93% +2 points
Images are optimised 17% 13% +4 points
Language and charset declared 90% 85% +5 points
hreflang for language variants — 99% —
Analytics is installed 73% 76% −3 points
Search Console / Bing verification 75% 82% −7 points
A favicon is set 99% 99% Level
No meta-refresh redirect 100% >99% Level
Your content survives without JavaScript 100% 97% +3 points
Your answer is in the HTML 100% 96% +4 points
Buttons, links and fields have names 38% 32% +6 points
Semantic HTML landmarks 45% 50% −5 points
Content is scannable in self-contained chunks 97% 94% +3 points
Claims come with figures, quotes or sources 57% 56% +1 point
Section headings are phrased as questions 21% 22% −1 point
Reading the page is affordable for a machine 91% 92% −1 point
No hidden text written for an AI model 100% >99% Level
Sitemap dates tell a machine what changed 68% 68% Level
The links in llms.txt resolve — 84% —
Author / publisher is clear 65% 51% +14 points
A machine-readable published / updated date 9% 11% −2 points
llms.txt is present and valid 26% 29% −3 points
Clean content for agents (Markdown) 3% 4% −1 point
Structured data is present 68% 56% +12 points
Structured data is valid 100% 97% +3 points
FAQ / Q&A schema — 47% —
Organization schema with sameAs 43% 33% +10 points
Right schema type for the page 98% 95% +3 points
Schema facts also appear in the page text 56% 57% −1 point
Breadcrumb structured data — 28% —
AI crawlers aren't blocked 95% 92% +3 points
Automated visitors can reach your pages — — —
Engines are allowed to quote the page 100% 99% +1 point
Your page arrives quickly 96% 97% −1 point
AI bot rules are explicit and intentional 10% 14% −4 points
Content usage preferences declared 1% 4% −3 points
Resource-discovery Link headers 3% 2% +1 point
No broken links 91% 87% +4 points
Links don't point at redirects 89% 92% −3 points
Descriptive anchor text 99% 99% Level
Sensible internal/external link mix 99% 96% +3 points
Links are real links 88% 92% −4 points
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) — — —
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) — — —
Interaction to Next Paint (INP) — — —
Page weight and render-blocking — — —
MCP Server Card 0% 1% −1 point
AI catalog 0% 1% −1 point
A2A Agent Card 0% <1% Level
WebMCP tools in the page 0% <1% Level
AI usage preferences (Content-Usage) 0% <1% Level
Licensing terms for AI (RSL) 0% <1% Level
Text-and-data-mining reservation (TDMRep) 0% <1% Level
Markdown version linked from the page 1% 1% Level
Content signals agree everywhere — — —
Agent Skills index 0% 1% −1 point
API catalog 1% 1% Level
OAuth authorization-server metadata 3% 2% +1 point
OAuth protected-resource metadata 3% 2% +1 point
OpenID Connect discovery 3% 2% +1 point
Web Bot Auth (operates a signed bot) 0% <1% Level
Universal Commerce Protocol manifest — 7% —
Auth.md agent registration 0% <1% Level
AI discovery via DNS 0% <1% Level

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

See how your site compares

A free scan checks all of this on your page in seconds, with no signup.

Scan your site free

Want it handled? We do that too. No pitch, just a plain-English chat.

Book a call