Research

Jekyll AI readiness statistics

In November 2026, we could only tell which sites run on Jekyll where our scanner could read the page, so this page covers those sites and says nothing about how many turned our scanner away.

Updated 04:07 UTC · November 2026

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

All sites on the State of the Web

How Jekyll sites land

Every page we read gets a score out of 100, the number at the top of its report (how scoring works). Each row is a range of scores. Where too few sites score in the lowest ranges, they are joined into one row.

  • 81–90 51%
  • 0–80 25%
Show as a table
Share of Jekyll sites in each score range
ScoreShare of sites
81–9051%
0–8025%

A platform is only detectable on a page our scanner could read, so these shares are of the Jekyll sites we could read.

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

Better or worse

Not enough history yet.

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

AI access

  • robots.txt disallows some AI crawlers 5%
  • robots.txt disallows major AI crawlers 2%
Show as a table
How Jekyll sites treat AI crawlers
What we foundShare of sites
robots.txt disallows some AI crawlers5%
robots.txt disallows major AI crawlers2%

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

What Jekyll sites get right and wrong

Passed more often than on the average site: “Structured data is present” (83%, against 53% of all sites); “Buttons, links and fields have names” (58%, against 37% of all sites); “Author / publisher is clear” (62%, against 47% of all sites). Least often passed: several checks that no Jekyll site we could read passed.

Every check, Jekyll against all sites

Share of sites that pass each check, over the sites the check applies to. The Gap column is the difference in percentage points between the two shares; a dash means not enough sites yet.

Jekyll sites against all sites: share passing each check
Check Jekyll sites All sites Gap (points)
Served over a secure HTTPS connection 100% >99% Level
HTTP redirects to HTTPS 82% 93% −11 points
No mixed (insecure) content 100% 99% +1 point
Core security headers are set 8% 12% −4 points
Not flagged for malware or phishing 100% 100% Level
No server version leakage 96% 90% +6 points
security.txt is published 1% 4% −3 points
Reached without a redirect chain 98% 98% Level
Caching or validation headers are set 95% 94% +1 point
The site settles on one host (www vs non-www) 87% 87% Level
robots.txt is present and not over-blocking 64% 88% −24 points
Not accidentally set to noindex 100% 99% +1 point
This page declares its canonical URL 71% 63% +8 points
Mobile viewport is set 92% 91% +1 point
Has a title tag 99% >99% −1 point
Title fits a search snippet 36% 52% −16 points
Has a meta description 80% 90% −10 points
Description fits a search snippet 44% 61% −17 points
The page has an H1 76% 77% −1 point
Logical heading order 66% 62% +4 points
Topic is consistent across title, H1 and description 57% 57% Level
Images have descriptive alt text 79% 90% −11 points
Your page's HTML isn't oversized 100% 98% +2 points
Open Graph tags for sharing 28% 34% −6 points
Twitter/X card tags 35% 69% −34 points
XML sitemap is present and referenced 49% 70% −21 points
Missing pages return a real 404 97% 89% +8 points
Images are optimised 8% 16% −8 points
Language and charset declared 93% 89% +4 points
hreflang for language variants — 99% —
Analytics is installed 44% 72% −28 points
Search Console / Bing verification 49% 79% −30 points
A favicon is set 81% 95% −14 points
No meta-refresh redirect 98% 99% −1 point
Your content survives without JavaScript 96% 93% +3 points
Your answer is in the HTML 88% 92% −4 points
Buttons, links and fields have names 58% 37% +21 points
Semantic HTML landmarks 51% 53% −2 points
Content is scannable in self-contained chunks 87% 89% −2 points
Claims come with figures, quotes or sources 56% 54% +2 points
Section headings are phrased as questions 21% 22% −1 point
Reading the page is affordable for a machine 99% 87% +12 points
No hidden text written for an AI model 100% >99% Level
Sitemap dates tell a machine what changed 48% 63% −15 points
The links in llms.txt resolve — 87% —
Author / publisher is clear 62% 47% +15 points
A machine-readable published / updated date 7% 13% −6 points
llms.txt is present and valid 7% 23% −16 points
Clean content for agents (Markdown) 4% 6% −2 points
Structured data is present 83% 53% +30 points
Structured data is valid 100% 97% +3 points
FAQ / Q&A schema — 44% —
Organization schema with sameAs 4% 27% −23 points
Right schema type for the page 12% 85% −73 points
Schema facts also appear in the page text — 54% —
Breadcrumb structured data — 23% —
AI crawlers aren't blocked 94% 89% +5 points
Automated visitors can reach your pages — — —
Engines are allowed to quote the page 100% 99% +1 point
Your page arrives quickly 95% 95% Level
AI bot rules are explicit and intentional 4% 16% −12 points
Content usage preferences declared 3% 5% −2 points
Resource-discovery Link headers 0% 1% −1 point
No broken links 90% 87% +3 points
Links don't point at redirects 81% 88% −7 points
Descriptive anchor text 99% 99% Level
Sensible internal/external link mix 91% 94% −3 points
Links are real links 85% 86% −1 point
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) — — —
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) — — —
Interaction to Next Paint (INP) — — —
Page weight and render-blocking — — —
MCP Server Card 0% 1% −1 point
AI catalog 0% 1% −1 point
A2A Agent Card 0% <1% Level
WebMCP tools in the page 0% 2% −2 points
AI usage preferences (Content-Usage) 0% <1% Level
Licensing terms for AI (RSL) 0% <1% Level
Text-and-data-mining reservation (TDMRep) 0% <1% Level
Markdown version linked from the page 1% 1% Level
Content signals agree everywhere — — —
Agent Skills index 0% 1% −1 point
API catalog 0% 1% −1 point
OAuth authorization-server metadata 1% 3% −2 points
OAuth protected-resource metadata 0% 2% −2 points
OpenID Connect discovery 0% 2% −2 points
Web Bot Auth (operates a signed bot) 0% <1% Level
Universal Commerce Protocol manifest — 10% —
Auth.md agent registration 0% <1% Level
AI discovery via DNS 0% <1% Level

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

See how your site compares

A free scan checks all of this on your page in seconds, with no signup.

Scan your site free

Want it handled? We do that too. No pitch, just a plain-English chat.

Book a call