Research

Remix AI readiness statistics

In November 2026, we could only tell which sites run on Remix where our scanner could read the page, so this page covers those sites and says nothing about how many turned our scanner away.

Updated 04:07 UTC · November 2026

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

All sites on the State of the Web

How Remix sites land

Every page we read gets a score out of 100, the number at the top of its report (how scoring works). Each row is a range of scores. Where too few sites score in the lowest ranges, they are joined into one row.

Not enough sites yet There are not enough sites yet to split them by score.

A platform is only detectable on a page our scanner could read, so these shares are of the Remix sites we could read.

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

Better or worse

Not enough history yet.

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

AI access

  • robots.txt disallows some AI crawlers 8%
  • robots.txt disallows major AI crawlers 2%
Show as a table
How Remix sites treat AI crawlers
What we foundShare of sites
robots.txt disallows some AI crawlers8%
robots.txt disallows major AI crawlers2%

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

What Remix sites get right and wrong

Passed more often than on the average site: “Description fits a search snippet” (98%, against 61% of all sites); “Organization schema with sameAs” (50%, against 27% of all sites); “Title fits a search snippet” (71%, against 52% of all sites). Least often passed: several checks that no Remix site we could read passed.

Every check, Remix against all sites

Share of sites that pass each check, over the sites the check applies to. The Gap column is the difference in percentage points between the two shares; a dash means not enough sites yet.

Remix sites against all sites: share passing each check
Check Remix sites All sites Gap (points)
Served over a secure HTTPS connection 100% >99% Level
HTTP redirects to HTTPS 88% 93% −5 points
No mixed (insecure) content 100% 99% +1 point
Core security headers are set 20% 12% +8 points
Not flagged for malware or phishing 100% 100% Level
No server version leakage 92% 90% +2 points
security.txt is published 0% 4% −4 points
Reached without a redirect chain 100% 98% +2 points
Caching or validation headers are set 76% 94% −18 points
The site settles on one host (www vs non-www) 90% 87% +3 points
robots.txt is present and not over-blocking 92% 88% +4 points
Not accidentally set to noindex 100% 99% +1 point
This page declares its canonical URL 68% 63% +5 points
Mobile viewport is set 90% 91% −1 point
Has a title tag 98% >99% −2 points
Title fits a search snippet 71% 52% +19 points
Has a meta description 84% 90% −6 points
Description fits a search snippet 98% 61% +37 points
The page has an H1 80% 77% +3 points
Logical heading order 54% 62% −8 points
Topic is consistent across title, H1 and description 66% 57% +9 points
Images have descriptive alt text 98% 90% +8 points
Your page's HTML isn't oversized 94% 98% −4 points
Open Graph tags for sharing 16% 34% −18 points
Twitter/X card tags 72% 69% +3 points
XML sitemap is present and referenced 76% 70% +6 points
Missing pages return a real 404 96% 89% +7 points
Images are optimised 9% 16% −7 points
Language and charset declared 98% 89% +9 points
hreflang for language variants — 99% —
Analytics is installed 84% 72% +12 points
Search Console / Bing verification 94% 79% +15 points
A favicon is set 100% 95% +5 points
No meta-refresh redirect 100% 99% +1 point
Your content survives without JavaScript 92% 93% −1 point
Your answer is in the HTML 96% 92% +4 points
Buttons, links and fields have names 20% 37% −17 points
Semantic HTML landmarks 22% 53% −31 points
Content is scannable in self-contained chunks 82% 89% −7 points
Claims come with figures, quotes or sources — 54% —
Section headings are phrased as questions — 22% —
Reading the page is affordable for a machine 42% 87% −45 points
No hidden text written for an AI model 100% >99% Level
Sitemap dates tell a machine what changed — 63% —
The links in llms.txt resolve — 87% —
Author / publisher is clear 50% 47% +3 points
A machine-readable published / updated date 2% 13% −11 points
llms.txt is present and valid 2% 23% −21 points
Clean content for agents (Markdown) 0% 6% −6 points
Structured data is present 64% 53% +11 points
Structured data is valid 84% 97% −13 points
FAQ / Q&A schema — 44% —
Organization schema with sameAs 50% 27% +23 points
Right schema type for the page 81% 85% −4 points
Schema facts also appear in the page text — 54% —
Breadcrumb structured data — 23% —
AI crawlers aren't blocked 92% 89% +3 points
Automated visitors can reach your pages — — —
Engines are allowed to quote the page 100% 99% +1 point
Your page arrives quickly 94% 95% −1 point
AI bot rules are explicit and intentional 6% 16% −10 points
Content usage preferences declared 2% 5% −3 points
Resource-discovery Link headers 0% 1% −1 point
No broken links 89% 87% +2 points
Links don't point at redirects 79% 88% −9 points
Descriptive anchor text 100% 99% +1 point
Sensible internal/external link mix 93% 94% −1 point
Links are real links 89% 86% +3 points
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) — — —
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) — — —
Interaction to Next Paint (INP) — — —
Page weight and render-blocking — — —
MCP Server Card 0% 1% −1 point
AI catalog 0% 1% −1 point
A2A Agent Card 0% <1% Level
WebMCP tools in the page 0% 2% −2 points
AI usage preferences (Content-Usage) 0% <1% Level
Licensing terms for AI (RSL) 0% <1% Level
Text-and-data-mining reservation (TDMRep) 0% <1% Level
Markdown version linked from the page 0% 1% −1 point
Content signals agree everywhere — — —
Agent Skills index 0% 1% −1 point
API catalog 0% 1% −1 point
OAuth authorization-server metadata 2% 3% −1 point
OAuth protected-resource metadata 2% 2% Level
OpenID Connect discovery 0% 2% −2 points
Web Bot Auth (operates a signed bot) 0% <1% Level
Universal Commerce Protocol manifest — 10% —
Auth.md agent registration 0% <1% Level
AI discovery via DNS 0% <1% Level

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

See how your site compares

A free scan checks all of this on your page in seconds, with no signup.

Scan your site free

Want it handled? We do that too. No pitch, just a plain-English chat.

Book a call