Bot Appétit the free AEO + SEO readiness check
Scan
Research

Squarespace AI readiness statistics

In November 2026, we could only tell which sites run on Squarespace where our scanner could read the page, so this page covers those sites and says nothing about how many turned our scanner away.

Updated 07:07 UTC · November 2026

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

All sites on the State of the Web

How Squarespace sites land

Every page we read gets a score out of 100, the number at the top of its report (how scoring works). Each row is a range of scores. Where too few sites score in the lowest ranges, they are joined into one row.

  • 91–100 48%
  • 0–90 52%
Show as a table
ScoreShare of sites
91–10048%
0–9052%

A platform is only detectable on a page our scanner could read, so these shares are of the Squarespace sites we could read.

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

Better or worse

Not enough history yet.

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

AI access

  • robots.txt disallows some AI crawlers 7%
  • robots.txt disallows major AI crawlers 3%
Show as a table
What we foundShare of sites
robots.txt disallows some AI crawlers7%
robots.txt disallows major AI crawlers3%

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

What Squarespace sites get right and wrong

Passed more often than on the average site: “AI bot rules are explicit and intentional” (99%, against 17% of all sites); “Images are optimised” (69%, against 18% of all sites); “Structured data is present” (99%, against 53% of all sites). Least often passed: several checks that no Squarespace site we could read passed.

Every check, Squarespace against all sites

Share of sites that pass each check, over the sites the check applies to. The Gap column is the difference in percentage points between the two shares; a dash means not enough sites yet.

Check Squarespace sites All sites Gap (points)
Served over a secure HTTPS connection 100% >99% Level
HTTP redirects to HTTPS 96% 93% +3 points
No mixed (insecure) content 98% 99% −1 point
Core security headers are set 1% 12% −11 points
Not flagged for malware or phishing 100% 100% Level
No server version leakage 100% 91% +9 points
security.txt is published 1% 4% −3 points
Reached without a redirect chain 99% 99% Level
Caching or validation headers are set 99% 94% +5 points
The site settles on one host (www vs non-www) 99% 88% +11 points
robots.txt is present and not over-blocking 99% 87% +12 points
Not accidentally set to noindex 100% 99% +1 point
This page declares its canonical URL 96% 63% +33 points
Mobile viewport is set 99% 90% +9 points
Has a title tag 100% >99% Level
Title fits a search snippet 28% 51% −23 points
Has a meta description 76% 89% −13 points
Description fits a search snippet 39% 60% −21 points
The page has an H1 74% 74% Level
Logical heading order 45% 61% −16 points
Topic is consistent across title, H1 and description 49% 54% −5 points
Images have descriptive alt text 93% 89% +4 points
Your page's HTML isn't oversized 96% 98% −2 points
Open Graph tags for sharing 69% 37% +32 points
Twitter/X card tags 90% 70% +20 points
XML sitemap is present and referenced 97% 70% +27 points
Missing pages return a real 404 99% 88% +11 points
Images are optimised 69% 18% +51 points
Language and charset declared 100% 90% +10 points
hreflang for language variants — 99% —
Analytics is installed 68% 70% −2 points
Search Console / Bing verification 63% 77% −14 points
A favicon is set 100% 96% +4 points
No meta-refresh redirect 100% 99% +1 point
Your content survives without JavaScript 98% 93% +5 points
Your answer is in the HTML 94% 91% +3 points
Buttons, links and fields have names 45% 38% +7 points
Semantic HTML landmarks 92% 53% +39 points
Content is scannable in self-contained chunks 91% 87% +4 points
Claims come with figures, quotes or sources 60% 54% +6 points
Section headings are phrased as questions 9% 21% −12 points
Reading the page is affordable for a machine 52% 85% −33 points
No hidden text written for an AI model 100% >99% Level
Sitemap dates tell a machine what changed 96% 64% +32 points
The links in llms.txt resolve — 88% —
Author / publisher is clear 20% 45% −25 points
A machine-readable published / updated date 20% 12% +8 points
llms.txt is present and valid 4% 22% −18 points
Clean content for agents (Markdown) 0% 6% −6 points
Structured data is present 99% 53% +46 points
Structured data is valid 99% 97% +2 points
FAQ / Q&A schema — 44% —
Organization schema with sameAs 2% 25% −23 points
Right schema type for the page 65% 83% −18 points
Schema facts also appear in the page text — 52% —
Breadcrumb structured data — 22% —
AI crawlers aren't blocked 95% 88% +7 points
Automated visitors can reach your pages — — —
Engines are allowed to quote the page 100% 99% +1 point
Your page arrives quickly 98% 95% +3 points
AI bot rules are explicit and intentional 99% 17% +82 points
Content usage preferences declared 1% 5% −4 points
Resource-discovery Link headers 0% 1% −1 point
No broken links 92% 87% +5 points
Links don't point at redirects 96% 88% +8 points
Descriptive anchor text 99% 99% Level
Sensible internal/external link mix 99% 94% +5 points
Links are real links 91% 85% +6 points
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) — — —
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) — — —
Interaction to Next Paint (INP) — — —
Page weight and render-blocking — — —
MCP Server Card 0% 1% −1 point
AI catalog 0% 1% −1 point
A2A Agent Card 0% <1% Level
WebMCP tools in the page 0% 2% −2 points
AI usage preferences (Content-Usage) 0% <1% Level
Licensing terms for AI (RSL) 0% <1% Level
Text-and-data-mining reservation (TDMRep) 0% <1% Level
Markdown version linked from the page 0% 1% −1 point
Content signals agree everywhere — — —
Agent Skills index 0% 1% −1 point
API catalog 0% 1% −1 point
OAuth authorization-server metadata 1% 3% −2 points
OAuth protected-resource metadata 0% 2% −2 points
OpenID Connect discovery 0% 3% −3 points
Web Bot Auth (operates a signed bot) 0% <1% Level
Universal Commerce Protocol manifest — 10% —
Auth.md agent registration 0% <1% Level
AI discovery via DNS 0% <1% Level

Based on the sites Bot Appétit has scanned. Most of these sites come from lists we scan for research. Not a random sample of the web.

See how your site compares

A free scan checks all of this on your page in seconds, with no signup.

Scan your site free

Want it handled? We do that too. No pitch, just a plain-English chat.

Book a call